Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
SizSkiizd wrote Resembles a late 80s-early 90s GM J-body, particularly a Pontiac Sunbird - I take the squished-in rear end as an artistic touch, no real car looks like that - and pretty pointless to have a boot that short when there's not even a hatch. Agreed | ||
Not sure what's so confusing. For reference: i.imgur.com/XIBDZ9m.jpg The tail lights have obviously been messed around with. | ||
Looks like a near perfect match to me. | ||
First generation Honda CR-V | ||
JFK wrote It is a decent model and it is free to use, I dont have much problem with the frequent usage of this. To me it looks kind of lazy when a game contains assets you see in many other games. Also there is some inconsistency in various models' level of detail. Not ripping on anybody though. Hiring someone to make 3d models for your game can be quite expensive. | ||
Same 3d model as igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=69541 or igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=95644 and it will be used by many future games, as it's on Unity asset store (part of a vehicle physics package) | ||
To me it seems to be largely based on the Porsche 956. The cockpit shape is a definite match, unlike 787 or Jag. Automation considers spoilers as separate add ons, so the base body has to have a slightly different spoiler-less rear end. Also, the rear is stretched lower because otherwise the underbody would be visible in Automation. Without these alterations I think it would be very close to the Porsche. | ||
My bad, should be [B], not [A] | ||
Mack DM-600 www.imcdb.org/i025465.jpg | ||
It's a W202 C-Klasse | ||
GAZ 52 or 53 | ||
Ford Falcon EF | ||
Toyota Corolla [E90] | ||
Police version of igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=95609 , therefore Opel Vectra | ||
Chassis code is T2 | ||
speedfreak975 wrote They didn't close Pontiac down so that Buick has a risk to get bankrupt. To me Buick lost its identity I'm pretty sure the only reason Buick wasn't axed during GM's restructuring was Buick's huge market share in China. Otherwise it would have made more sense keeping the Saturn brand for dumping Opel designs in the US. As for Buick's identity, the recent Opel based models are far more interesting cars than the beigemobiles they made in the 90s. The previous Regal/Century was one of the most faceless and bland vehicles ever sold. In my opinion Opel designs have really made Buick a more attractive brand than they were in late 90s to 00s. | ||
Desscythe17 wrote I think the rear half is definitely not a DB7. The roofline is not as gradual as the DB7, but more radical like the Venturi. The car is also more boxy than the DB7. I see your point, but I think the sharper roofline and boxiness is a byproduct of the limited number of polygons. | ||
For example: Rover P5 sedan and coupe: imgur.com/a/ZelI8 1941 Mercury sedan and coupe: imgur.com/a/H24yZ | ||
Burn Rubber wrote But it's not. Coupes don't have 4 doors. :P The difference between sedans and coupes have never been the number of doors. Both can have 2 or four. It's nothing new or recent. | ||
Zordid wrote they shoud know the difference between an estate and an shooting brake... What is it then? | ||
Honestly, this one wasn't intended to resemble any real-world model. It's just a generic 1990s car, designed to be a flexible base body in the game. I know that this place seems to avoid MFG like plague, so I don't mind if you list it as something you think it shares similarities with. AutoTracker wrote Why did they list it as "90sSedanPatario" in the game files then? It's just a file name. Since the unlock year for this body is 1992, 90sSedan made sense. That's not to say this body can't be used to make a 2000s sedan in the game. | ||
Reminds me a bit of the MV-1 upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/MV-1_yellow_cab_NY.jpg | ||
One of my favourites! | ||
Transporter came both as panel van and basic windowed passenger van. The Caravelle and Multivan were only available as passenger vans, which compared to the passenger Transporter had better equipment and nicer interiors. There are multiple versions of this in the game, including windowless panel versions. | ||
Your top view drawing of the Mondeo has the side windows way too curved and slanted. What did you use as a reference? The roof of the mk1 Mondeo is quite flat actually, and viewed from the top, looks just as flat as the Sierra's. Also, you seem to ignore that the Sierra has additional rear quarter windows, which the Mondeo doesn't. Just like the Mundano. All signs point towards Mondeo. | ||
Fiat 238 i.wheelsage.org/pictures/fiat/238/autowp.ru_fiat_238_ambulance_1.jpg | ||
Burn Rubber wrote And what else? Cause a window doth not a Mondeo make. Let's see... the whole car. It's a Mondeo with the usual GTA1 altered proportions (shorter body, especially shorter bonnet). Looks absolutely nothing like a Sierra nor a Scorpio (except from the early DMA concept's front end... but that is not in the game) Since you're "siding with Maxine", there's obviously no point in arguing with you. | ||
The rear window, for example, is definitely Mondeo: | ||
Burn Rubber wrote The Slamvan was practicly a custom Ratloder anyway. This is why I hate R* It's a old pickup that's just in good shape and has a different front end. igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=69732 Huh? Two completely different vehicles. | ||
Plymouth Valiant | ||
Mercury Messenger | ||
It's RWD. Although, apparently there has been small-scale production of FWD version with different mechanicals since the late 1990s. The mainstream mass produced 2126s are still RWD (or 4x4) | ||
Now that you mention it, yeah it does look a bit too big. Not the first scaling inconsistency in GTAV, though. This is what the front door at Pitchers looks like: i.imgur.com/sMF2cat.jpg | ||
Similarly to the sedan, it's a Citroën C5, modified to look barely recognizable and shrunken to the size of a compact car. i.imgur.com/aUEpKpw.jpg -- Last edit: 2016-02-15 15:42:10 | ||
Either a 1963 Phantom V or a Phantom VI. | ||
Yeah. The dashboard, for example, is a 1999 Fiat Punto. | ||
Some resemblance to Honda Domani: i.wheelsage.org/image/format/picture/picture-gallery-full/honda/domani/autowp.ru_honda_domani_3.jpeg | ||
Great! I love seeing oddball POS cars in video games. Clearly a nod to Breaking Bad, as that pale green color was not a factory option. | ||
Hakari wrote http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3443/3380444007_b6ace7289f.jpg So this is Freightliner. Most likely a 1995 FL Series but i'm not sure about the exact model. That's the older bodystyle, from the 80s. Fits perfectly well in 80s to 90s setting. (1987 dump truck with the exact same cab: i.imgur.com/m5PFlHl.jpg ) The newer ones (since early 90s) look like this: www.ericsfirepics.com/CAN/Montreal_Salvage513.jpg | ||
S40 | ||
Since this here seems to be the place for criticism towards the vehicle range in GTA V, I'll chip in my $0.02 There should be WAY more cars from the 90s and 80s. Modern era (2000+) cars are well represented, same applies for cars from 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. Why are there so few 1980s and 1990s cars then? This is what a lower income SoCal street scene looks like: i.imgur.com/lOrqxjb.jpg | ||
There's a very thin line between a wagon and an MPV. Also, considering that there's a lot of overlapping between body styles, in my opinion, either are fine for the Prius v. | ||
Burn Rubber wrote Fun fact. This was removed and replaced with a similar model. But im pretty sure this can stay. Caus ethe Roosevelt in GTA V is on here and it's been unavailable for almost 2 years now. Big difference. The Roosevelt may not be available to purchase in GTA Online, but it still exists in the game. Anyone who purchased it at the time and kept it, has it; plus it's available in single player. | ||
Rover 400. | ||
I'd say it's a mashup of Austin Princess and Rover SD1. | ||
Burn Rubber wrote But they pretty much are. It's the exact same design. Sure it's very similar, but it's still not quite a carbon copy. As long as it doesn't carry any GM/Chevy names or logos (which it obviously doesn't), they're good. | ||
Burn Rubber wrote Even the wheels. Why not just get a copyright and slap the Chevy logo on? You've pretty much copied the whole car. There's a reason why the GTA series never uses licenced cars. Doing that would impose so many restrictions, for example not being able to blow 'em up or run over pedestrians in them. Car companies don't want to see their products portrayed in a negative manner. | ||
It's a reference to a Top Gear episode where they had to choose the perfect used car for a teenager and Clarkson rolled up in a Volvo estate. | ||
In addition to the obvious Citroën SM design cues, it also shares a lot of similarities with the 1967 Zagato-styled Rover 2000 TCZ www.carstyling.ru/en/car/1967_rover_2000_tcz/ | ||
Zordid wrote Actually this is very similar to the Prius C&A Custom Concept shown at SEMA 2010 This. |