Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
GeoZR177
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-15 21:58 | So I found that this car takes some design cues from the Spectre Performace Camaro, which features the large fenders, massive rear tires and a similar rim design | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:58 | They could add Willard, Marbelle, Merit, Perennial, Feroci, Lokus, original Schafter, Sabre, Chavos, DF8-90, Hakumai, PMP 600, Solair, Super Drop Diamond, Cavalcade FXT, Uranus... The DLC/update called "Yeah you can finally after 2 play somehow GTA Online without 10+ minutes loading to lobby", "You can kill someone when you unload whole Combat MG extended magazine (200 bullets) from 20 meters to him" or "This update doesnt mess up the gameplay of story more even more that it was before / doesnt try to make out of your PC a scorched earth" would be nice addition too. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:45 | ZoomZoom wrote It was in a previous scene undamaged but it was kind of blurry. In my opinion there is no excuse for not having a car from IV into V. The HD interiors are all rendered from IV cars and the damage/plate mapping is simple. Any car ported from IV would be better than the abominations R* churns out for DLC here. Did you see the proportions on the Nightshade and Mamba? Yeah, the Nightshade has way too muscled fenders, specifically for a car that is from oil embargo. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:42 | What ales it worse is that the DID have them in, but took almost all of them out. And now we're getting these shitty IRL (almost) cars instead of what we want! This is why I hate Rockstar | |
ZoomZoom photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:21 | It was in a previous scene undamaged but it was kind of blurry. In my opinion there is no excuse for not having a car from IV into V. The HD interiors are all rendered from IV cars and the damage/plate mapping is simple. Any car ported from IV would be better than the abominations R* churns out for DLC here. Did you see the proportions on the Nightshade and Mamba? -- Last edit: 2015-12-15 21:22:50 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:12 | How can you even tell? O.o | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:12 | Or at least a Sultan RS. (The REAL one.) | |
ZoomZoom photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:11 | This is the Merit from GTA IV. | |
ZoomZoom photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 21:10 | What a waste of disk space, we already have 2 Ballers(an uncreative name in itself) which are only noted for being a quick sell at LSC. Why don't you add the Huntley or something that isn't a minor face-lift of an existing car. | |
krq9 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 20:47 | Burn Rubber wrote But they pretty much are. It's the exact same design. Sure it's very similar, but it's still not quite a carbon copy. As long as it doesn't carry any GM/Chevy names or logos (which it obviously doesn't), they're good. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 20:05 | But they pretty much are. It's the exact same design. | |
krq9 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 19:50 | Burn Rubber wrote Even the wheels. Why not just get a copyright and slap the Chevy logo on? You've pretty much copied the whole car. There's a reason why the GTA series never uses licenced cars. Doing that would impose so many restrictions, for example not being able to blow 'em up or run over pedestrians in them. Car companies don't want to see their products portrayed in a negative manner. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 19:14 | Even the wheels. Why not just get a copyright and slap the Chevy logo on? You've pretty much copied the whole car. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 19:11 | Guess this is all we'll ever see of it in GTA V. | |
Attacker1997 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 19:03 | Dinka Chavos from GTA IV | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 18:06 | JFK wrote Rear picture cannot be changed, unless you give me the credit for it (you cant change manually the contributor, whoever "send" the picture for validation, is automatically contributor) No problem | |
Tycek
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-15 17:49 | He can always make a new page with both pictures and then this page will be deleted. | |
Tuppence870 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 17:45 | WARD-ENTERPRISES wrote I will answer that in Your Nation's language ''Nein nein nein nein nein!!!'' Speedevil is Belgian, not German... | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 17:42 | Speedevil wrote Can't you remove the rear pic so he can send a new one? I don't know, just asking. Nah, just blue nicks can do that | |
AutoTracker
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-15 17:30 | And my mistake, turns out the normal Baller is listed as a Range Rover Sport. | |
civic_eg6_94 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 17:27 | vocal95 wrote Better pics: i.imgur.com/MepG1zC.jpg i.imgur.com/gs6OxK2.jpg That look modified to me... Is it? Cuz if it is, it's not allowed here. | |
Zordid photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 17:19 | It's actually a rip off of the Range Rover SVR I think Edit: Range Rover Sport SVR sorry -- Last edit: 2015-12-15 17:23:56 | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 16:46 | Better pics: i.imgur.com/MepG1zC.jpg i.imgur.com/gs6OxK2.jpg Zordid wrote Hope this doesn't cost too much. I don't wanna talk about the name though As you all had expected, the cars in this DLC cost a lot. Nightshade costs 600k, Verlierer is 700k and you need 1m to get a Mamba. | |
Speedevil photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 16:34 | JFK wrote Rear picture cannot be changed, unless you give me the credit for it (you cant change manually the contributor, whoever "send" the picture for validation, is automatically contributor) Can't you remove the rear pic so he can send a new one? I don't know, just asking. | |
AutoTracker
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-15 16:25 | So theoretically is this a Range Rover Sport? It looks like one. It would also be the first current gen Range Rover Sport on IGCD. | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 15:49 | Well... It's almost identical to the original 2nd gen Baller (at least for me), but features carbon fiber details and comes in 2 different versions - short wheelbase and LWB (both available armored or unarmored). | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 15:14 | Better pics: i.imgur.com/vSrkNj9.jpg i.imgur.com/6ZJzRTv.jpg Also, in-game name is "Benefactor Turret Limo" not "Strech E". | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 14:56 | Better pics: i.imgur.com/WoLSgev.jpg i.imgur.com/Kski9rd.jpg Unfortunately you can't paint it in stripes. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 14:23 | vocal95 wrote Better pics: i.imgur.com/rwmQEnw.jpg i.imgur.com/IqfGo26.jpg IMHO only front grille looks like 1972. The bubble-like rear window and cluster tailights suggest 1975+ Camaro. Rear picture cannot be changed, unless you give me the credit for it (you cant change manually the contributor, whoever "send" the picture for validation, is automatically contributor) | |
vocal95 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-15 13:25 | Better pics: i.imgur.com/rwmQEnw.jpg i.imgur.com/IqfGo26.jpg IMHO only front grille looks like 1972. The bubble-like rear window and cluster tailights suggest 1975+ Camaro. | |
krq9 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-14 19:00 | In addition to the obvious Citroën SM design cues, it also shares a lot of similarities with the 1967 Zagato-styled Rover 2000 TCZ www.carstyling.ru/en/car/1967_rover_2000_tcz/ | |
Zordid photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-14 15:30 | It's a Camaro with Firebird taillights | |
Hakari photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-13 20:11 | It's Lenco BEAR not a Bearcat. Bearcat is smaller than this vehicle. www.lencoarmor.com/law-enforcement/bear-variants/ EDIT: Also the category appears to be wrong. It's not a van or MPV but more likely an military armored vehicle. Other BEAR/Bearcats are listed under various categories like SUV or even as a simple truck. What a mess... -- Last edit: 2015-12-13 20:19:40 | |
GamerFIB7590 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-13 12:04 | Old Sentinel | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-13 03:10 | To me this is like a Ford GT/ GT40 | |
Cerberus276 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-13 01:30 | Considering this is an Imponte Model, Its a Pontiac Firebird, Not a Camaro | |
Zordid photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-12 10:49 | Hope this doesn't cost too much. I don't wanna talk about the name though -- Last edit: 2015-12-12 10:51:27 | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-10 17:20 | This car is officially confirmed to be in Executives and other criminals update on 15th december 2015. I guess I must be in a passive mode for a while, because with this all GTA: O servers will be like in full riot mode | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-10 17:16 | This car is officially confirmed to be in Executives and other criminals update on 15th december 2015. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-10 17:16 | This car is officially confirmed to be in Executives and other criminals update on 15th december 2015. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-10 17:14 | This car is officially confirmed, see trailer that was posted on Newswire few minutes ago. | |
Attacker1997 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-09 17:34 | PikesPeak wrote The rims design is similar to SpecV model... So.... someone add a trim ? or no? The rims and the exhausts | |
Tuppence870 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 22:51 | I guess that does clear things up. I was disappointed that you appeared to disregard the value of my work. I had tried very hard to keep it as fair as possible, as with all vehicles in these games, this is a mixture. Personally, I don't believe the taillights, black plastic and wagon area (all of which have to be modified to match up to the Stratum) are more notable than the wealth of details that match perfectly with the Skyline. I'm still a little confused about the beige line you're talking about, since the beige line is on the hood. Perhaps you mean the pale green line that runs the length of the car? That does appear on the Stratum in the same spot as the Skyline (which I had previously explained as the feature that sold me on the Skyline), but it's not visible under certain lighting conditions. You can see it more clearly here: Also, here's something I'd wanted to do before but didn't have a good base image for - an overlay of what could be attributed to Subaru or Skyline within the Stratum. Obviously, this doesn't account for elements not visible in side view. Skyline is represented in red, Subaru in blue, places where both could apply are purple and places that don't match either are black: -- Last edit: 2015-12-06 22:52:40 | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 22:23 | i.imgur.com/pryojHm.gifv I know, it is not the best, but it could be worse. Also, for some strange reason nothing is shown when I put [img][/img]. -- Last edit: 2015-12-07 16:29:09 | |
Tycek
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-06 21:00 | Tuppence870 wrote Tycek, I'm not going to dignify that with a full response. I'm fully aware of the points you're making, because I've made them myself. If you want your answers, go back and look for them and stop wasting my time. Tuppence, I wasn't even talking about that debate. I agreed with you back in October "I've seen your evidence and I can agree about some of them, but at the same time I think you are trying to hard to push your opinion. This car is clearly a mix between Impreza, Accord and Skyline, so we should really make a consensus instead of trying to push one car over the other here, because there always will be someone who will not agree with the final result of the debate." and I'm not trying to stir up any shit here. I was posting clues about it being a Subaru, to make it clear this car is not 100% Skyline. If you want it to be listed as Skyline, so be it. I didn't changed it, locked it or do other things that would be considered as against your points, did I? And I was saying about some general rule "And some rules regarding this new double standard has to be set, because right now it seems that car will be identify as person who screams the loudest wants." to prevent us from any more situations. How about posting a guess and showing some proof confirming it? I was talking generally here, we got this page to have logical debates, as they were done in the past where people were actually trying to identify the car instead of creating drama rama all over the page. Debate about Skyline may be considered as finished to the point when someone brings some real proof of this being different car. How about that? And rule about different standard has to be set, because currently we're identifying the cars however people like. Proposition about setting the rules was written here as we don't have the forums we could use for some debate and since it's pretty crowded place why not talk about it here and now. @JFK I would like to see the morphing if you have the time and will to do it. -- Last edit: 2015-12-06 21:05:58 | |
Tuppence870 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 20:41 | Tycek wrote because right now it seems that car will be identify as person who screams the loudest wants. Tycek, I'm not going to dignify that with a full response. I'm fully aware of the points you're making, because I've made them myself. If you want your answers, go back and look for them and stop wasting my time. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 19:40 | What the actual hell? Is there never peace on the Stratum page??? We had a fine agreement and this stupid argument had stopped. Tycek we get it. It's not a perfect match. It's not supposed to be! It's a fictional car! It's not like it actually says Skyline in the back, or has Subaru badging. I mean after all that list Tuppence provided we should all have settled this now. GTA basicly mashes two cars together. In this case, Skyline R32 and a Wagon. But I guess this page will now just never have peace on it. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 19:08 | Tycek wrote Stop being a goddamnit drama queen. Nobody is fighting a war here, people are not dying. But if any debate has to be turned into a war, maybe it's better to slap any name on the car and call it a day, because it was identified after all. And some rules regarding this new double standard has to be set, because right now it seems that car will be identify as person who screams the loudest wants. I am on your side Tycek. I can do a morph of Allante and a Primo if you want to. I saw in Stratum a Skylene, so I am completly okay with Primo/Allante. After all Tahoma from GTA: SA is listed as Monte Carlo with two extra doors | |
Tycek
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-12-06 19:01 | Stop being a goddamnit drama queen. Nobody is fighting a war here, people are not dying. But if any debate has to be turned into a war, maybe it's better to slap any name on the car and call it a day, because it was identified after all. And some rules regarding this new double standard has to be set, because right now it seems that car will be identify as person who screams the loudest wants. | |
JFK photo_librarymode_comment 2015-12-06 18:57 | I like Mcthieve car pic better, so I will change the main one. I cant do anything about the secondary, unless I post there mine Voodoo. |