Advertising
Pictures

Comments
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() 2025-04-06 17:26 | www.steamlocomotive.info/nloco.cfm?which=1769 archive.org/details/lightlocomotives00hkporich/page/78/mode/2up?view=theater archive.org/details/lightlocomotives00hkporich/page/76/mode/2up?view=theater Based on Cylinder Size, she appears to of been built as a BS 16 Ton , likely the order class of Kresse or Kothig on the Porter catalog. Once my current edit suggestion is rejected I will update it accordingly. -- Last edit: 2025-04-06 17:31:17 |
![]() ![]() 2025-04-06 17:18 | clandohoome wrote Click on the link I posted, this is a locomotive on display in Sedalia. It was originally built as an 0-4-0T, and was later converted to an 0-4-2, as shown in your first link. Then it was given an anachronistic rebuild into its current 4-4-0 form, presumably to make it more of a tourist attraction. Oh damn your right, my bad, in her current state she would still classify as a B-4-T (4-4-0), although as built she was likely an porter BS series if she was built as an 0-4-0T -- Last edit: 2025-04-06 17:38:38 |
![]() ![]() 2025-04-06 17:06 | Epicstormchaser wrote https://www.steamlocomotive.info/nlocoalbum.cfm?which=1769 Yeah this was mislabeled, its also a 4-4-0 not an 0-4-0 or 0-4-2T. It does look like a Porter though as it shares its appearance with the Porter 4-4-0 in there catalog. Click on the link I posted, this is a locomotive on display in Sedalia. It was originally built as an 0-4-0T, and was later converted to an 0-4-2, as shown in your first link. Then it was given an anachronistic rebuild into its current 4-4-0 form, presumably to make it more of a tourist attraction. |
![]() ![]() 2025-04-06 15:58 | www.steamlocomotive.info/nlocoalbum.cfm?which=1769 Yeah this was mislabeled, its also a 4-4-0 not an 0-4-0 or 0-4-2T. It does look like a Porter though as it shares its appearance with the Porter 4-4-0 in there catalog. archive.org/details/lightlocomotives00hkporich/page/18/mode/2up?view=theater I am unsure of what order class is belongs to, so for now I'm going to just label it as a plain old B-4-T -- Last edit: 2025-04-06 16:02:18 |
![]() ![]() 2025-04-05 02:27 | 1925 HK Porter 0-4-0T |
Add a comment
You must login to post comments...