Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
| Burn Rubber wrote bad photoshopping... Shame GT Sport Devs. It's not bad it just need readjusting...the reflections. The game still in development | ||
| Yeah I think it was the foreshadow of the veyron .... But I'm no Bugatti expert | ||
| Shouldn't Hennessey performance or at least Hennessey be part of the name | ||
| So their logic is only Forza affects their image....we will see GT sport. Still dumb logic | ||
| So it has SS badge does Chevy not care about mobile games ? | ||
| I never remembered this car in gt2 and I played that thing for years.....I'm crushed | ||
| Why is it a Saab not Alfa considering its .....unique looks | ||
| How am i being rude, when you of all people make fun and couldn't care less . anyways glad you tasted your own medicine because speaking normally about the rules...you'll probably disrespect the persons opinion which you did. plus you took silly goose as a rude insult ....srsly . This is the internet if I truly wanted to insult you I would have | ||
| krq9 wrote I'm pretty sure the only reason Buick wasn't axed during GM's restructuring was Buick's huge market share in China. Otherwise it would have made more sense keeping the Saturn brand for dumping Opel designs in the US. As for Buick's identity, the recent Opel based models are far more interesting cars than the beigemobiles they made in the 90s. The previous Regal/Century was one of the most faceless and bland vehicles ever sold. In my opinion Opel designs have really made Buick a more attractive brand than they were in late 90s to 00s. Well it's Opel, Buick designs were tidious and boring .buick to me has become a badge used on American opels. Because here the buicks on sale aren't the Opel ones. Because Opel has a market here | ||
| The roof is flat, if it was a db7 regardless of polygons shouldn't it be a bit curved....plus I've seen better work from a some older games so it's no excuse Edit: not that I disagree after a 2nd look, it's a db7 with a Mitsubishi 3000GT spoiler ...I think -- Last edit: 2016-05-25 17:32:04 | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote There are no laws in automotive design as far as I know. To everyone his own opinion well some people believe in restrictions which was available in older times. where there exceptions. off course but not at this magnitude . design was always classified...hell we do it here all the time. but with modern design its getting gray and vague | ||
| I don't see a Dino the rear is kinda of a Wiesmann | ||
| It's a Venturi with a db7 fascia | ||
| It's funny you still think old rules apply. Silly goose this the new age of design.....the 570 GT can be classified as a GT, a hatchback and a sports car or supercar....which is a first. We already said that what was black and white doesn't exist on new cars it's grey. This is a coupe in today's world like it or not. Compare it to normal GLE and see the difference. The fact you think old laws still work makes me laugh | ||
| Zordid wrote ...which just isn't a coupe but it is | ||
| enzo96 wrote Duh yeah Sorry i meant Burn rubber :P I don't think I will download CSR again (oddly enoguh they are still updating the game) , but at least i'm not alone who is seeing it this way, if they changed it though then it means everyone got ripped off in the past, if they made CSR2 easier, then i may give it a shot, I use the US appstore it's still not there, I dunno what's taking them so long Simple .... It all depends on what car you choose in the beginning, The earlier CSRs (racing and classics). A few cars in a tier can beat the boss car maxed without the special fuel | ||
| Tuppence870 wrote Seriously?? Firstly, GM took full control of Opel back in 1931, at the height of Buick's success. I'm fairly sure Opel models have only been rebranded as Buicks since the Opel Astra became the Chinese Buick Excelle XT in 2009. Obviously, they're talking about the newest 2010+ Buick Regal, which is a rebranded 2008+ Opel Insignia. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/2011_Buick_Regal_CXL.jpg On inspection of the bodylines, I certainly agree with the Buick Regal, although the front is very similar to the Acura RL. But I must stress, this is NOT Made for Game - it's a Buick Regal. i know GM bought Opel back then , the omega and corsa. Early 2000s. All I'm saying GM has been asigning almost all their new opels designs basically to Buick because it wasn't selling that great They didn't want a fuck up. They didn't close Pontiac down so that Buick has a risk to get bankrupt. To me Buick lost its identity | ||
| Well which regal/Opel does that look like. All I know is that GM bought Opel so that they can save Buick ass from bankruptcy Edit : I mean which year -- Last edit: 2016-05-22 23:56:29 | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote I think it looks like a Buick Regal with an Audi A6 rear. Whether the game states it's Japanese or not, since I don't really see any American-Japanese sedan in this. At least it's not a Jetta in any way. The regal is an Opel/Vauxhall so...the question is does Opel sell in America ? | ||
| JFK wrote Land-Rover? The windshield is quite sloped though. Well there is the Lada Niva but I'm not sure | ||
| Still the SLS is more dominant, the rest can be considered from various cars. after all we focus on the majority and that chassis screams SLS disregarding what the headlights or grill looks like for example | ||
| Burn Rubber wrote Rotor: www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=60891 MX2000: igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=561 Just for anyone wondering. I personally don't see it except in the headlights. Both are RX-7 and share same styling | ||
| Razor440 wrote I think it's supposed to be like a Fisker Karma but with two doors. Even thought it resembles the karma, it has more of SLS dimensions and mainlook disregarding the small details | ||
| GroupB wrote Body is definitely 350 Yes but it has a 370 face and back, so I'm just asking we name based on body | ||
Burn Rubber wrote Well when a person looks at it , thy think it's completely opaque both ways and that they will ......(what I said above) -- Last edit: 2016-05-18 01:42:43 | ||
| Burn Rubber wrote This is getting old and repetitve. Nobody else is chiming in so it should just stay the way it is. Did u even bother to compare rear ends. That rear glass in enough proof, and it's been like that for a while because no one thought of noble because almost no one thinks of them, it's like they don't exist..,.sadly. I'm not convinced with this staying a HSC but whatever ![]() | ||
| Burn Rubber wrote ONE WAY. As in, only visible from one side. Ohhhhhhhh lol and end up in a wall | ||
| Obviously a 370z with a NISMO bumper Edit :mixture of both 350 and 370 but 370z more dominant -- Last edit: 2016-05-18 01:33:52 | ||
| Burn Rubber wrote All of that right there is wrong. Sides and cabin match up closer than a Noble, and the dimensions may be off, but like you said, it can't be exact. Noble is not a closer match than HSC. Its as easy as that. Noble is too boxy and squared off. The HSC is also boxy, the rear of HSC is nothing like the tempesta from the bumper to the whole rear window to the weird taillights. oldconceptcars.com/1930-2004/honda-hsc-concept-2003/ (Focus on the rear area and side area and it's way shorter and not even same width) They are nothing alike (areas I mentioned, anyways...dunno m600 is best but that thing didn't exist when this was out....m14 is a squarish m600. But i dunno any third opinion | ||
| Burn Rubber wrote One way winsheild? Lol what windshield | ||
| It's a city car ( labeled by car magazine and caranddriver) and the nearest thing to the categories is supermini | ||
| [V35] chassis code ? | ||
| GroupB wrote Look at the taillights. I see a 1990 ranger can actually fit the bill | ||
| R34 skyline | ||
| GroupB wrote This is a Ford Ranger/Mazda B-Series Are you sure, looks like a s10 to me | ||
| 2nd gen rx-7 (fc) | ||
| 2008 hatchback ? Like the one in horizon | ||
| RKDxNT3000 wrote Eunos NA Miata/Mazda Miata MX-5 +1 | ||
| 3rd generation , right ? NC | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote I don't think so. The S15 is more round. This car looks like it has S13 headlights. +1 | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote And Grand Familia if we're starting on that. And the grand familia Coupé ....so mush names ![]() | ||
| It's a 1973 , I'm certain | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote My bad, this is a Mazda RX-3/Savanna, not a Nissan Skyline. Also known as a Mazda 808 ![]() | ||
| Yes it's a RX3 which was made 1971 till 78 | ||
| JFK wrote RX-8 is a special case Here you have comparsion between 2-door and 4-door. I think you can see from these two pics that this is 2-door, and in sake of tradition we list this as coupe. Car classes got messed up lately, because everything can be anything. I know, that's the thing it looks exactly like the 2 door version but that line :p, and that's why I named Rx-8 , sadly there is no more black and white it's all grey nowadays | ||
| Desscythe17 wrote Nissan Skyline GT-R R32 +1 , some of these cars are really obvious why are they all unknown | ||
| Pretty sure it's official name is GT LM GTE and not GT race car | ||
| How does one see from this ....thing | ||
| JFK wrote Just take the length of front door and you will see that rear doors would be way too short even 2-doors were sedans, but I dont think this is supossed to be some very basic unsporty model, so coupe is more correct in my opinion. RX-8 is a 4door Coupé ....just saying . Length isn't a restriction anymore, but yeah u might be correct -- Last edit: 2016-05-17 19:34:34 | ||
| JFK wrote I will modify his/her edit to be normal, not troll-alike I don't think it's a coupe if you look closely to the rear tire there is a line, maybe it's a 4 door |
Here you have comparsion between