Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
The game hasn't been released yet, but if this is in the game, I think the car on this page is definitely a 370Z. www.pictaram.com/media/1146176175742232110_468587152 | ||
Called Acura RSX on the game's instagram. | ||
That would imply not everyone believes it is a 350Z | ||
The trunk of the 350Z becomes pretty much flat, whereas the 370Z's trunk slants down all the way. The car in the picture also has a trunk that slants down all the way. I do understand your argument though, the proportions are off, but I think that has to with sloppy design + dumb bodykits. | ||
Burn Rubber wrote Looks more like a 350Z to me. Trunk isn't chopped off. The lights and body are definitely 370Z. [Z34] -- Last edit: 2016-05-17 23:56:13 | ||
On WCS, supermini is also used for Messerschmitt and similar cars. Wouldn't supermini be a better term than city car for those cars? | ||
speedfreak975 wrote Also known as a Mazda 808 And Grand Familia if we're starting on that. Also Mizer in North America. -- Last edit: 2016-05-17 19:48:05 | ||
JFK wrote Yes, it should be S15 I don't think so. The S15 is more round. This car looks like it has S13 headlights. | ||
JFK wrote C111 I will be suprised if I got that code right. KPGC110 | ||
My bad, this is a Mazda RX-3/Savanna, not a Nissan Skyline. | ||
Skyline GT-R | ||
Nissan Silvia? | ||
Impreza | ||
Nissan Skyline GT-R R32 | ||
Nissan 180SX | ||
Silvia S14/240SX | ||
JFK wrote E90, right? The taillights are from an E90 yeah. | ||
Is this actually a BMW? The headlights don't seem to indicate so. | ||
Speedevil wrote Looks like a E30 to me. +1 | ||
BMW E46 | ||
Rinspeed wrote it's me, and i'm the only one who accept the cars at this moment (other are SWF not here since a long time and Takumi here since a little time) so each day i had more than 100 or 200 to validate so not easy. On other hands what is the problem with this car? Okay. I deleted my other comment, as it makes no sense after you have explained the situation. -- Last edit: 2016-05-16 23:43:29 | ||
Which admin actually approved this? Not trying to hunt a witch here, but please, don't blindly accept entries. -- Last edit: 2016-05-16 20:10:03 | ||
For this same reason I don't agree with people identifying Japanese kei cars as "supermini". -- Last edit: 2016-05-16 13:52:11 | ||
GeoZR177 wrote Actually Noble first started producing cars in 1999. Burn Rubber wrote Noble *M600's first production: 2010 -- Last edit: 2016-05-16 02:29:50 | ||
Adrigaaas90 wrote You'll include also Renault 20? Just looked that up and found this ad: bestride.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/8472050568_839560a7be_z.jpg What are they trying to say? All I can think of is soufflé, but I'm pretty sure souffle is something else entirely. | ||
Mark0 should be able to correctly identify this. I know it's a Jag XJ, but not exactly which year. | ||
JFK wrote Where this world come when ever Rinspeed starts off-topic discussion And as an ultimate JDM guy do you aprove Hakari´s answer? You know me better than that. I would have already raised an objection if I thought Hakari was wrong. And WCS isn't that crowded, so off-topic is okay if it's not all the time. | ||
Sorry, I was busy discussing the Eurovision Song Contest on Webcarstory | ||
Shame they didn't add the BTCC Tourer, but this is also a nice car. | ||
Sadly they haven't really added that many JDM cars since GT4. GT5 had between 5 and 10 new ones I think, and GT6 none as far as I know. | ||
GroupB wrote Here's where I differ on the site thinking for a change. Mk. I isn't needed for the Skyline Sport because there was only one generation. It's redundant. Show me a Mk. II Skyline Sport and I'll shut up. It's true that the Skyline Sports is actually a seperate series. So Mk. could be removed, but then the full name has to be Skyline Sports instead of Skyline. | ||
Noko Tau wrote Wasn't sure about naming this MK I since this certainly isn't the first Prince Skyline. There were six variations before it. Giovanni Michelotti's¹ BLRA-3 might be based on Takuya Himura#s S21s but obviously significantly different enough to warrant a new chassis/ body code. ¹ Of Ferrari, Maserati & Triumph fame. Mark I is correct. | ||
Tuppence870 wrote The number of doors doesn't make a difference. Shooting Brakes are estates but combined with coupe elements, primarily the curved rear of the cabin. On a slightly different note, the number of doors doesn't affect sedans/saloons or coupes either. A coupe is defined by its curved roof shape, so coupes can have 2 or 4 doors. I don't entirely agree with that. I think the idea of a 4-door coupé is kind of nonsensical since coupé is French for cut off, and is generally a shorter car. Building a 4-door sedan with a sloping roofline doesn't change the fact that it is a sedan. | ||
speedfreak975 wrote Simple an estate is usually of a sedan , while a shooting brake originally started as a coupe and estate merged together. 2 doors only. However due the last year many companies such as MB and Audi and such have been creating sport coupes with 4 doors such as the CLA, CLS , RS7 and such. so shooting brakes now can have 4 doors. And a shooting brake explanation now is simply an estate with a coupe roofline. So Zordid technically they didn't change the concept they just ultered it.....and I don't mind cuz this thing is fine It's not entirely fair to blame it on the past few years. The Aston Martin Lagonda Shooting Brake also had 4 doors. | ||
Noko Tau wrote I'd agree with the Baja Bug and that the A4 Beetles can't really be called 'New', especially since there's an A5 Beetle. And I see your point about future entries completely ignoring these facts. I think you're misinterpreting the name "New Beetle". It doesn't have to be the new and current model, all it is is a modern version of the classic Volkswagen commonly known as the Beetle. Volkswagen always refers to this car (the A4 Beetle) as "New Beetle", so I think listing it as simply Beetle is wrong. | ||
Funnily enough, that exhaust represents tuned Golfs in real life quite well. | ||
Hakari wrote He said it's "fake" because it lacks SS badges. Ah okay, so the rest of the model is finally correct? | ||
Zordid wrote Yees the fake Camaro, my favorite I've caught on to this before. I did a quick image search, but I couldn't find what exactly the problem is. Could you point out in what ways this car doesn't match its real-life counterpart ( I see some minor trim differences, but I'm not sure that's what you're referring to). en.wheelsage.org/chevrolet/camaro/i/1969/95099/17880/pictures/ -- Last edit: 2016-05-08 00:46:58 | ||
Zordid wrote The car they destroyed for the sake of a bad comedy film? It's the sad Hollywood truth. | ||
Zordid wrote In my opinion it's the most ugly Camaro yet.... The new Mustang looks at least a million times better I agree, the rear gives off a GM Korea vibe to me. I think the front is alright, but the previous Camaro looked so much better. -- Last edit: 2016-05-07 10:56:38 | ||
rbodyfan wrote 1970 Ford XL Convertible Looks nothing like it www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=19694 | ||
The rear is definitely Lanos, the rest is similar enough. | ||
I can't find out what it is, Toyota Probox/Succeed is the closest I can find. The car is probably a lot boxier than the car it is based off of. -- Last edit: 2016-05-06 13:38:21 | ||
OuIGCD wrote 2006-2012 Honda Zest? Yes definitely. | ||
Because like a bunch of other cars, they were never sold under the name of Mazda. Same goes for Efini and Autozam. | ||
The Drifting Duck? | ||
This was still called Impreza. The generation after this (2014-) is called WRX. | ||
Sold through the Efini marque in 1991. -- Last edit: 2016-05-05 22:58:20 | ||
Called Savanna RX-7 in Japan. | ||
I would say Daihatsu Hijet again, but the truck version has a different front which doesn't match with this vehicle. So for me, it's a Daihatsu Hijet Cargo made into a truck. |