Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
Burn Rubber
2016-09-13 01:22 | It's just not a GT40 though... I think you may be biased anyway. ![]() | |
Racedriver43
2016-09-13 01:20 | Hakari wrote But the rear is completely different. It has the GT40 Hood to door Vents, (I'm talking on the rear here, not the front.) it has multiple bulbs in the foglights, which only certain GT40 models have, it has a more rounder front, etc. | |
Zordid
2016-09-12 23:50 | I think it looks way too modern to be a GT40 | |
Hakari
2016-09-12 23:00 | Racedriver43 wrote Carbuerators, single stripe, and classic looking seats. It's a GT40 with elements of the GT. But the rear is completely different. -- Last edit: 2016-09-12 23:02:54 | |
speedfreak975
2016-09-12 22:59 | the general looks are so modern compared to the gt40 its the 2002 concept | |
Burn Rubber
2016-09-12 22:56 | Racedriver43 wrote Carbuerators, single stripe, and classic looking seats. It's a GT40 with elements of the GT. Beta version had 2 stripes though. It's more like GT with elements of GT40. ![]() | |
Racedriver43
2016-09-12 22:55 | Carbuerators, single stripe, and classic looking seats. It's a GT40 with elements of the GT. | |
speedfreak975
2016-09-12 22:46 | this is most definitely not gt40 | |
Hakari
2016-09-12 22:38 | Burn Rubber wrote Short explanation: RockStar f-ed up and put in a car from the wrong timeline. It's a GT not GT40. That's it. In-game year shouldn't be taken into account. I thought that this case is closed. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-09-12 22:28 | Short explanation: RockStar f-ed up and put in a car from the wrong timeline. It's a GT not GT40. | |
Hakari
2016-09-12 22:08 | Razor440 wrote This is obviously a Ford GT, but since the game is set in 1992, this is a Ford GT40. Strange, considering 60's nostalgia wasn't that big in the 90's. Are you kidding me right now? The only reason to list it as GT40 is that the game takes place in 1992? | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 21:43 | 1972-1973 International Harvester D-Series (1000D/1010/100-Series) with revised grille. Very similar to a 1972 Dodge D-100, but the grille, bumper shape, and body shape suggests an International Harvester. | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 21:36 | Dodge Dynasty, no doubt, no arguing, no other answer, please. | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 21:36 | This is obviously a PARODY. It's not supposed to be super-realistic to the real thing. So keep it as a 1965 Chevrolet Impala. | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 21:33 | This is obviously a Ford GT, but since the game is set in 1992, this is a Ford GT40. Strange, considering 60's nostalgia wasn't that big in the 90's. | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 21:29 | It's a 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass crossed with a 1969 Ford Mustang Notchback or Convertible. Body seems to be bulky like a Mustang whilst the front, rear, and hood are Oldsmobile Cutlass inspired. -- Last edit: 2016-09-12 21:38:22 | |
Razor440
2016-09-12 20:57 | LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP wrote Looks like a 57 Packard Clipper to me. Nope, it's a 1961 Dodge Polara sedan. I don't see any Packard inspired elements on this car. -- Last edit: 2016-09-12 20:57:45 | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 18:07 | Yah the name and body style are obviously spoofing the Mustang. | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 17:47 | Looks like a 57 Packard Clipper to me. pre10.deviantart.net/b7db/th/pre/f/2010/205/6/e/1957_packard_clipper_sedan_by_haafasst.jpg | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 08:08 | No doubt a Ford Thunderbird. | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 08:06 | I don't get how anyone could NOT see this as a Ford Ranger. This is one of the car models in the game that's literally just a carbon copy of its real life counterpart. carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/4/606/1869/39013434001_original.jpg | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 07:46 | I don't get how anyone can see this as a Jeep. Jeep Wagoneer's have taller heights and shorter lengths. The Landstalker, on the other hand, is shorter in height and longer in length, and also has a longer hood length. It is very obviously a reference to the early 90's Blazer/Jimmy/Explorer/Pathfinder style midsized SUV's. Just because Jeeps had wood panelling doesn't automatically make this a Jeep. Hell, if the wood panel is what's convincing everyone of this being a Jeep, here's a photo of a GMC Jimmy with wood paneling. hanabi.autoweek.com/sites/default/files/styles/gen-738-415/public/5973197632_e826c8565c_o.jpg?itok=j6RRgmzM For further proof of this not being a Jeep, the Landstalker in all other GTA games has been identified as a Ford Explorer, Ford Expedition, and a GMC Jimmy. Why would it be a Ford/GM in all other games but a Jeep in this one? What sense does that make? Seriously, compare this Landstalker to the body lengths of the vehicles in those photos, and then see the Jeep Wagoneer this car is being labeled as. image.trucktrend.com/f/28557719+re0+ar0+st0/1991-ford-explorer-front-three-quarter.jpg upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/1st_Chevrolet_S-10_Blazer_4-door.jpg only-carz.com/data_images/gallery/02/nissan-pathfinder-v6-se/nissan-pathfinder-v6-se-05.jpg consumerguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/94126111990409.jpg Jeep Wagoneer: static.cargurus.com/images/site/2008/07/24/20/00/1984_jeep_grand_wagoneer-pic-27457.jpeg -- Last edit: 2016-09-12 08:02:43 | |
LANDSTALKERisntaJEEP
2016-09-12 06:51 | I originally thought it was some sort of Oldsmobile, maybe a '88 Cutlass Ciera (carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/4/1013/4461/40032230448_original.jpg), but now I am positive it's an early Camry. | |
JDMracerocket96
2016-08-24 16:55 | This thing spawns SO MUCH anywhere. | |
Aginnon
2016-07-27 16:07 | nor Jackie Chan, he drove an Euclid in one film. | |
Mel
2016-07-09 04:11 | I agree that it looks pretty similar to a 1970s Lincoln Continental for the most part. However, those are some rather large bumpers for 1971. This style of bumper, with black rubber strips no less, makes this hearse look like a post-1973 automobile. Yes, these bumpers were introduced in 1973, but it wasn't until 1974 that it was required to have both front and rear bumpers of this kind. Click the link below for details. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bumper_(car)#United_States The grille shows that it can't be any newer than 1976, as the '77 through '79 models had upright Rolls-Royce inspired grilles which were used on the Mark series Continentals. I'd say it's a 1974 - 1976. 1974 www.dyna.co.za/cars/1974%20Lincoln%20Continental%20Blue%20sf021.jpg 1975 / 1976 www.automobile-catalog.com/img/pictonorzw/lincoln/76cont.jpg -- Last edit: 2016-07-09 04:20:28 | |
Razor440
2016-05-22 01:33 | Golf...Club. | |
ZoomZoom
2016-03-28 02:10 | Model year is 1989 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-03-28 02:09 | Model Year is 1984 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-03-28 02:06 | Model year is 1990 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-03-28 01:54 | Model year is 1989 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-03-28 01:52 | Model Year is 1991 | |
sajmon14
2016-03-01 12:11 | OuIGCD wrote Skyline R34 in 1992?! No way! the game was released in 2004 so it's possible. Well but it doesnt look like a R34 | |
OuIGCD 2016-03-01 12:08 | EminemRUS wrote R34 Skyline R34 in 1992?! No way! | |
Burn Rubber
2016-02-20 00:34 | Ingame of course. ![]() The real Prelude is beautiful. ![]() | |
ZoomZoom
2016-02-20 00:21 | In real life or in the game? | |
ZoomZoom
2016-02-12 00:04 | +1 on 1987 | |
EminemRUS
2016-02-11 07:25 | R34 | |
Burn Rubber
2016-02-07 21:15 | For some reason this car would have looked better as a sedan to me... | |
ZoomZoom
2016-02-07 19:50 | Si trim model | |
ZoomZoom
2016-02-07 19:47 | Model is Mk.II and Chassis code is SW20 | |
Ryan2t4
2016-01-22 16:17 | Easy pal,i got idea why you dont instal the Car spawner? | |
GroupB
2016-01-07 20:04 | IROC was just a trim level. There's nothing to say whether it was just a base Camaro or whatever. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-01-07 05:09 | ^+1 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-01-06 23:18 | Automotive Gaming wrote I do not agree. Wheelarches size are the same as the Camaro ones, since the Daytona ones are smaller. Also, if you notice, the wheelarches "lips" are more similar in terms of size to the Camaro ones than the Daytona ones (Daytona ones are less pronounced). Mirrors are mounted on doors for both Camaro and Buffalo, while the Daytona ones are mounted aside the window. Daytona has a scoop on the front bumper between the headlights which the Buffalo and the Camaro don't have. The Daytona front bumper lip is way smaller than the Buffalo and Camaro ones, also the front bumper lip cut (where the lip is mounted/starts) is exactly placed in the same point for both Buffalo and Camaro. The front bumper overall design is same as the Camaro. Buffalo side window design is the same as the Camaro. The Camaro just doesn't have the rear side triangle window because of the bigger trunk window. The side door design is same as the Camaro. The trunk wing, same as Camaro. www.sitedogta.com.br/imagens/veiculos/originais/buffalo%203.jpg www.iroc-z.com/1986pics/1986gallery/Jeffs%20Iroc%20Front%20Index%20Pic.JPG i.imgur.com/axMfEHj.jpg Remember that you can't have an exactly replica of a real car in a GTA game (or any other game with fake cars), so the developers must use their fantasy to add random details here and there to confuse who sees the car, maybe also borrowing those details from a whole different vehicle (GTA4/5 Infernus = half Lambo, half Zonda.) Luckily, the GTA SA Buffalo is way more clear to identify. Small OT: I agree with you about the Super GT "bump", because it is indeed an SW20 rather than an AW11. You have a point, the RWD and the V8 are convincing enough. I still think that the car is a mixture between the Camaro and Daytona with Manta 400 headlights but this will do. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-01-03 05:47 | Hey, I've seen this car up close in The Sims 2. (#ModsForLife! ) and I would NOT call it a Daytona. Im sorry but I see no resemblance. Maybe the rear tailights, but the rest is Camaro. Plus, haven't we learned NOT to trust a car by its so called "Manufactre" or "Likeness"? (Ahem, Stratum and Infernus. Cough) So I think Camaro. So... | |
AutoTracker
2016-01-03 01:05 | Oh boy. I hope this doesn't turn into an argument similar to the Stratum.... ![]() | |
Automotive Gaming
2016-01-03 00:34 | ZoomZoom wrote Lore or not it still borrows the majority of its visual features from a Dodge Daytona. I'm basing this on the rear since the front is based off multiple cars that are anachronistic to the game. I do not agree. Wheelarches size are the same as the Camaro ones, since the Daytona ones are smaller. Also, if you notice, the wheelarches "lips" are more similar in terms of size to the Camaro ones than the Daytona ones (Daytona ones are less pronounced). Mirrors are mounted on doors for both Camaro and Buffalo, while the Daytona ones are mounted aside the window. Daytona has a scoop on the front bumper between the headlights which the Buffalo and the Camaro don't have. The Daytona front bumper lip is way smaller than the Buffalo and Camaro ones, also the front bumper lip cut (where the lip is mounted/starts) is exactly placed in the same point for both Buffalo and Camaro. The front bumper overall design is same as the Camaro. Buffalo side window design is the same as the Camaro. The Camaro just doesn't have the rear side triangle window because of the bigger trunk window. The side door design is same as the Camaro. The trunk wing, same as Camaro. www.sitedogta.com.br/imagens/veiculos/originais/buffalo%203.jpg www.iroc-z.com/1986pics/1986gallery/Jeffs%20Iroc%20Front%20Index%20Pic.JPG i.imgur.com/axMfEHj.jpg Remember that you can't have an exactly replica of a real car in a GTA game (or any other game with fake cars), so the developers must use their fantasy to add random details here and there to confuse who sees the car, maybe also borrowing those details from a whole different vehicle (GTA4/5 Infernus = half Lambo, half Zonda.) Luckily, the GTA SA Buffalo is way more clear to identify. Small OT: I agree with you about the Super GT "bump", because it is indeed an SW20 rather than an AW11. -- Last edit: 2016-01-03 00:41:23 | |
ZoomZoom
2016-01-03 00:01 | Lore or not it still borrows the majority of its visual features from a Dodge Daytona. I'm basing this on the rear since the front is based off multiple cars that are anachronistic to the game. -- Last edit: 2016-01-03 00:07:40 | |
Automotive Gaming
2016-01-02 23:37 | ZoomZoom wrote Delete my posts all you want, it doesn't change the fact that this is A Dodge Daytona. Look at the pillars and the taillights. Plus, the Buffalo is canonically a Dodge in other GTA games. If you know the GTA series well you should also know that the fantasy vehicles of the game often change between the episodes. Example: www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=123 www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=50385 or: www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=1514 www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=12693 GTA brands also aren't trustable. Example: www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=60517 www.igcd.net/vehicle.php?id=65765 Plus, the Buffalo engine sounds in San Andreas are of a V8, while the Daytona only had inline 4s and a V6. -- Last edit: 2016-01-02 23:55:08 |



) and I would NOT call it a Daytona. Im sorry but I see no resemblance. Maybe the rear tailights, but the rest is Camaro. Plus, haven't we learned NOT to trust a car by its so called "Manufactre" or "Likeness"? (Ahem, Stratum and Infernus. Cough) So I think Camaro. So...