Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
Maxine 2016-04-24 19:56 | Got some neoplan stylein there from what I looked up... But Im no exper so they could all use the same body for all I Know :P | |
Maxine 2016-04-24 19:53 | Ok I know its just an opinion but to me the dodge was allways ugly as sin. Its kinda a shame all vans have lost there style but hey, Progress eh? American vans are dead. But still we gona see em for a long time right? I mean.. Mines allmost 30 years old.. Back to the car, The turn signals and rounded rear just seem more e seires like. It reminds me a lot of the version they put in saints row. -- Last edit: 2016-04-24 19:54:30 | |
Hakari
2016-04-24 19:52 | I've randomly typed "airport bus" in google and this came out: www.eobus.com/upimages/bus/20112611262441121.jpg I have no idea what is it however... Looks pretty close. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 19:50 | Well I guess the Transit is a good call. But I always thought "Satellite Vans" were an American thing. -- Last edit: 2016-04-24 19:55:10 | |
Hakari
2016-04-24 19:48 | Burn Rubber wrote Do they even have such vans in Europe? I know that we Americans don't have them at the rate you see in video games or TV shows, But they are here. In reality, I may have seen one or two of these IRL. But the usually are based from E-Series vans. More rarely an Econoline. Nowadays you have the same vans as we in Europe, just rebadged, like Dodge Ram Van is rebadged Fiat Ducato. In the past we had a bit different vans. This one actually shares some similarities to Ford Transit MkII: s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/bf/10/34/bf10342216435bb01daaa03a25ef50b1.jpg | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 19:42 | Do they even have such vans in Europe? I know that we Americans don't have them at the rate you see in video games or TV shows, But they are here. In reality, I may have seen one or two of these IRL. But the usually are based from E-Series vans. More rarely an Econoline. -- Last edit: 2016-04-24 19:43:04 | |
Maxine 2016-04-24 19:39 | The whole shape of this seems very E Series, also ive never seen those euro vans with the large equipment on the roof, So ya, Id say a ford E Series TV van thing here. the whole design just looks more americanised than the eroish transit... Even tho its pixels. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 19:36 | stryder237 wrote Its another word for an airport bus Thank you for info. I never heard this before. | |
Maxine 2016-04-24 19:35 | Now Im gona go here and say this looks europian with its very sloped front like a, late 90s fiat or such. | |
|
stryder237
2016-04-24 19:35 | Its another word for an airport bus | |
JFK
2016-04-24 19:27 | Pushback tractor, I am unsure in which category this belongs. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 19:25 | It is Apron Bus, whatever that means. | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 19:03 | JFK wrote ![]() I see more of 1st Transit in it. I think they chose the Transit because... Jeremy Clarkson wrote In the 1970's, 80% of all bank jobs featured a Ford Transit van as a getaway vehicle... I think there has been multiple episodes of Top Gear where Clarkson, May and Hammond have said so. Or this van just got lucky, and was put in this game regardless. -- Last edit: 2016-04-24 19:04:26 | |
JFK
2016-04-24 18:51 | ![]() I see more of 1st Transit in it. | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 18:50 | JFK wrote I was searching for a while to get this particular color. I like it! Presentation is key, that's for sure. | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 18:47 | Manta Mirage, with optional spoiler. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 18:47 | Razor440 wrote This could be a homage to the WagonQueen Family Truckster. I was searching for a while to get this particular color. | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 18:46 | This could be a homage to the WagonQueen Family Truckster. | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 18:43 | Trabant 601? | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:23 | Racedriver43 wrote 2016 Jeep Cherokee? Nope. This is almost a copy of the Nissan Juke that is already listed. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:20 | Another New Holland? The colors are almost identical. | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:19 | Toyota Baja Truck | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:16 | Sauber-Mercedes C9? | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:15 | Volvo 850 | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:14 | With those taillights it seems to be a Volvo C30 | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:12 | Another Juke/Murano...? | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 18:11 | Not a Transit but just a Ford F100 Panel Van | |
Speedevil
2016-04-24 18:08 | It looks like a trophy truck. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 17:42 | The color helps it too. This time game was wrong with Wagon classification. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 17:41 | carcrasher88 wrote TVR, perhaps? Oh yes, TVR Tuscan in my opinion. | |
carcrasher88
2016-04-24 17:41 | Shape kinda reminds me of a Nissan Leaf. | |
carcrasher88
2016-04-24 17:40 | TVR, perhaps? | |
carcrasher88
2016-04-24 17:39 | Ford Crown Victoria | |
JFK
2016-04-24 17:39 | carcrasher88 wrote Caterpillar Bobcat doesn't exist, they're two completely different brands. I am seeing these things with "BobCAT" badge, that is why I listed is as Catepillar. My mistake. | |
carcrasher88
2016-04-24 17:38 | Caterpillar Bobcat doesn't exist, they're two completely different brands. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 17:31 | 1995 Suzuki Super Carry? ![]() | |
JFK
2016-04-24 16:45 | Subaru Libero maybe? | |
Hakari
2016-04-24 15:14 | Something there reminds me of Econoline. But Transit also match... | |
Hakari
2016-04-24 15:05 | The whole profile tells me that it's Grumman-Olson P-800: www.87thscale.info/images/Specials/packagetruck/truck-2-2.jpg But the doors are placed too close to the front axle. It's the closest match so far anyway. | |
JFK
2016-04-24 14:36 | Amphibious car | |
Mark0
2016-04-24 10:22 | Maybe MG A www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=7395 | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 08:16 | Actually, It looks a lot like the 2016 Murano... | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 07:38 | If it's an Austin-Healey then it's probably a 3000 MKII | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 07:35 | So 1941 Unknown? Or should we agree on one of these shockingly similar cars? | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 07:34 | Judging on this I'm going to say this is a 1932 Ford Coupe | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 07:31 | Jaguar XK120? That's not right! Triumph was a closer bet than that... Maybe we need to leave this one as unknown for a bit until we get a match that actually matches. ![]() | |
Burn Rubber
2016-04-24 07:27 | This one is literally a box. Made For Game. C'mon people. All this Cadillac and Mercury talk is nonsense. At least the others have some shape and features. | |
Desscythe17
2016-04-24 07:18 | Razor440 wrote Nah, seems to have a pillar in the middle So? It wasn't a hardtop coupe in the 80s. webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=13819 | |
Desscythe17
2016-04-24 07:14 | Razor440 wrote Oh stop it. There is a difference between a '41 Packard and a '41 Ford. But hardly any between a 41 Ford and a 41 Mercury or a 41 Chevy and a 41 Pontiac ![]() I'll agree that Packard at least made more interesting cars at that time (unlike later, when they were headed towards bankruptcy). -- Last edit: 2016-04-24 07:15:44 | |
Razor440
2016-04-24 03:17 | Hakari wrote Is it 2-door? If it is, it looks like Cadillac Coupe DeVille with those rear lights. Nah, seems to have a pillar in the middle |



.gif)