Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:21 | Before anyone calls BS on the Camry being form 2017: i.imgur.com/t2mT5JL.png Bam. Straight from the official website. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:20 | plus another case the Mercedes-AMG GTR. AMG stated that it was a 2017 model yet it was revealed as a preview in 2016 that doesn't make it a 2016 model. almost every company is doing what Ford did -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 02:25:11 | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:16 | Automotive Gaming wrote Ok go re-list the 2002 GT Concept as 2004-2005 so, right?? Please! Because the 2002 GT Concept was showcasing the upcoming 2004-2005 model so that automatically makes the 2002 Concept a 2004-2005, right?? Again, please! well technically no becuse ford stated it was 2002-2003 car back then because that time jumping was a thing yet -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 02:22:04 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:11 | As far as today, The concept model is exactly the same as the planned production model. So that point is invalid for now. The concept is showcasing a 2017 vehicle. Making it a 2017. Concepts are never produced to the public, so why list the year for a vehicle never driven by anyone other than Ford workers? (And maybe some special people like Car And Driver or other car magazines) Ford has stated it is a 20217. So listing it as anything else is ridiculous. You can buy a 2017 Toyota Camry right now. In 2016. So they year it was made doesn't mean nothing. -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 02:12:45 | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:07 | technically its of 2015 like many concepts seen but the company stated that its a 2017 so why argue when we basically follow valid statements . this is a licensed car so respect its brand . plus to be honest it felt more of a prototype than a concept which differ. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 02:00 | Burn Rubber wrote 1. It's not pretending. It's the model year. 2. This still needs to be listed as a 2017. It was not produced in 2015 and the concept is of the 2017 model. true but sometimes some companies just do stupid things....buying a car of a year that still didnt come yet was kind of stupid eventhough it was technically December | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 01:57 | 1. It's not pretending. It's the model year. 2. This still needs to be listed as a 2017. It was not produced in 2015 and the concept is of the 2017 model. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 01:56 | i know I'm not with that trend at all. and yes im referring to other models considering ford is not the only guilty party. alot do it. all im saying we should respect their stupid rules because we depend on hard facts....no matter how stupid it looks. and i understand we bought a 2010 yaris in Q4 of 2009... lol | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 01:49 | well its too late, if this is accepted over 100s of entries need to be altered. plus the whole point of a Motorshow is for brands to blazon their future models. so the years should not be messed with. we should follow what the respective brand reveals about their model. we have no right to alter it -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 01:49:53 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 01:31 | speedfreak975 wrote plus your thinking is faulty when your depending on whar year a car is built. considering the 2017 production model will be built from 2016 and considering not all concepts and prototypes which this falls under a proto more are built in a year the LFA took years for example so your logic is questionable Yeah. Most cars are named a year later than they are made. (Some 2012 cars are made in 2011 for example) So that logic is indeed questionable. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 01:14 | Automotive Gaming wrote Ford says this is a 2017 because in 2017 it will enter production, but the car we all saw, we know it has been built in 2015 since it's not the production version plus your thinking is faulty when your depending on whar year a car is built. considering the 2017 production model will be built from 2016 and considering not all concepts and prototypes which this falls under a proto more are built in a year the LFA took years for example so your logic is questionable -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 01:18:16 | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-07 00:56 | sure in that logic all cars from the detroit motor show are 2015 models..... -_- i honestly dont care anymore. im not sure why all this nonsense. this isnt even the first entry for this car on IGCD. this isnt different from any of the entries so this fuss is stupid and pointless. Ford announced the car as a future model. the 2002 GT was announced as a 2003 GT40 later to be known as GT. so that entry isnt the most reliable proof yet on netcarshow its labeled as 2002 and the IGCD entry follows that.yet once it comes to the 2017 model things change... -- Last edit: 2016-08-07 01:03:14 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 23:58 | Be smart? I'm providing proof it is a 2017. I'm not being a moron. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 23:50 | imgur.com/sT3T4AC Same model as the in-game car. It can't be a 2015. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 23:43 | It's a 2017... | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 23:07 | 2015 is wrong, if this is accepted alot of others would need to be altered. the year displayed is the models year not its reveal year. all cars are revealed before launch. plus i think WCS puts reveal year and supposed year but IGCD doesn't i think not sure -- Last edit: 2016-08-06 23:11:19 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 22:15 | speedfreak975 wrote yes but its was revealed as 2017 car.....the new mercedes GTR is revealed as 2018 model. car are revealed before their launch so technically its not 2015 its 2017 +1 to that | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 22:11 | yes but its was revealed as 2017 car.....the new mercedes GTR is revealed as 2018 model. car are revealed before their launch so technically its not 2015 its 2017 | |
AutoTracker
photo_librarymode_comment
2016-08-06 19:04 | Actually it's a 2015 show car because it was unveiled at the 2015 Detroit Auto Show. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 14:11 | +1 on 2017. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 14:09 | That doesn't make sense (USA year ?) literally on every website it's 2017 and all entries are according to that | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 11:32 | All entries are 2017 it's the 2015 concept for the 2017 model . It's better to unify the entries in my opinion | |
Rinspeed photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 11:14 | speedfreak975 wrote still not sure why 2016 isnt getting changed its wrong even if the game states it. if forza had some mistakes im pretty sure this might if you dont believe me that this is a 2017 rinspeed www.netcarshow.com/ford/2017-gt/ you talk of usa year, not worlwide year. And the years aren't good for concept. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-06 10:34 | still not sure why 2016 isnt getting changed its wrong even if the game states it. if forza had some mistakes im pretty sure this might if you dont believe me that this is a 2017 rinspeed www.netcarshow.com/ford/2017-gt/ | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-05 14:00 | Like all other entries it's a 2017 eventhough the game states it's a 2016, I trust them as much as I believe Fox News .... The 2016 Ford GT Is the GTE version. (Race version) | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 21:12 | its 2017 and a concept. the production GT is slightly different | |
AutoTracker
photo_librarymode_comment
2016-08-04 20:49 | Not sure if this is the 2015 concept or the production model. Either way it's a 2017 | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 20:23 | Hmm well, Afaik this car is 2017 | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 20:17 | They could always be wrong. | |
Rinspeed photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 20:07 | enzo96 wrote I think you meant 2017 no they said 2016 | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 20:04 | I'm sure there will be | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-08-04 20:04 | I think you meant 2017 | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-07-31 16:04 | considering porsche is free ....is there a chance of seeing it in a vanilla mobile game. | |
Speedevil photo_librarymode_comment 2016-07-29 19:20 | speedfreak975 wrote yes the identity crisis has finally ended to bad viper wont exist after 2017 It was also supposed to stop after 2010. I guess they'll release a new Viper in a few years, just like they already did with this generation. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2016-07-29 19:01 | yes the identity crisis has finally ended to bad viper wont exist after 2017 | |
GeoZR177
photo_librarymode_comment
2016-07-29 12:17 | Its actually the Dodge Viper ACR, FCA dropped SRT as a seperate brand after the 2014 model year. -- Last edit: 2016-07-29 12:24:14 | |
jusgtr photo_librarymode_comment 2015-11-06 05:03 | Car was vaulted on Oct 05 2015 | |
holden nut
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-08-13 05:27 | FG GT-P with the 5 Litre Boss V8 Engine. | |
Burn Rubber photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-28 02:07 | This is the car that little hacker stole from me. Damn you man! I haven't played this game in over a year! I was going to re-download it on my tablet, but it said it wasn't compatible. I'm NOT going to try to play this game because I had all of my in-game money hacked away, car stolen, account hacked, and locked out of the game for a week because whoever hacked it was doing bad things I guess. And they thought it was me. Plus everyone has hacked in infinite money. This game is crappily thought out security-wise. It needs more anti-hack systems and ban anyone who hacks in cash. But to that little jerk who ruined my game, screw off. R.I.P. Racing Rivals. 2013-December 2013. | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-28 00:58 | enzo96 wrote Yeah that's weird considering these cars are For GT Only, i doubt that if they will get copyrights problem also since it's called DS line? is that a name change of the manufacturer since it's not called citroenl? i just googled and couldn't find anything, any useful info would be nice I guess the DS Line is inhouse tuning branch for citreon afterall DS stands for the iconic 70s citreon DS, but it was announced back in 2013and both GT and survolt are older. basically ds line cars are know for their elgence,futuristic looks,and performance.Yet still no explanation i found why they switched names of the cars -- Last edit: 2015-07-28 01:01:09 | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-27 19:45 | speedfreak975 wrote Same with the Citroen survoit in asphalt after an update it became DS line , dunno anything about it in real life though. However I'm not sure how they got GT vision car. asphalt 8 has the VW vision car but not sure how they got it. Yeah that's weird considering these cars are For GT Only, i doubt that if they will get copyrights problem also since it's called DS line? is that a name change of the manufacturer since it's not called citroenl? i just googled and couldn't find anything, any useful info would be nice | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-27 19:03 | enzo96 wrote Why is it called Ds line and not Citroen? And more importantly why does it have the logo of Citroen then? I thought it's impossible because it's gt exclusive Same with the Citroen survoit in asphalt after an update it became DS line , dunno anything about it in real life though. However I'm not sure how they got GT vision car. asphalt 8 has the VW vision car but not sure how they got it. | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-27 18:56 | Why is it called Ds line and not Citroen? And more importantly why does it have the logo of Citroen then? I thought it's impossible because it's gt exclusive | |
speedfreak975 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-25 10:58 | I actually like its general look more aggressiveness, almost all mobile games have this poor models this is good compared to some Gameloft models. Did you see the camaro in GT racing 2 it looks horrible. The only good models I think are real racing 3 -- Last edit: 2015-07-25 10:59:51 | |
carcrasher88
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-07-25 04:24 | I think it's more of because it's an internet/mobile game. You wouldn't expect to see this kind of stuff in a Forza Motorsport/Horizon title (though they've had errors, too). | |
PikesPeak
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-07-25 02:46 | It's Murica , what do you expect? | |
carcrasher88
photo_librarymode_comment
2015-07-25 02:33 | I look at the in-game rear shot, and then look at an official shot, and I can tell this model isn't THAT well made. First, the creases and lines of the body aren't all that well defined, with most of those on the rear blending in. Second, the portion below the license plate isn't supposed to be body colored, it's supposed to be unpainted plastic. www.netcarshow.com/chevrolet/2016-camaro/800x600/wallpaper_0a.htm -- Last edit: 2015-07-25 02:33:54 | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-07-24 23:08 | Not fan of how the rear looks, I think I prefer the 2015 model | |
enzo96 photo_librarymode_comment 2015-02-05 21:12 | Wow nice | |
fontheking5
photo_librarymode_comment
2014-09-07 20:52 | Lightning |