Advertising
Pictures
![](images/040/787.jpg)
![](images2/040/787.jpg)
Comments
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() 2017-02-22 23:31 | CarCrazedAlex586 wrote I have been to a page before. I always make sure, so don't let this get into an argument. END OF CONVERSATION! I'm not starting an argument, I'm just saying you're wrong. You said my argument was bad because (Japanese) wikipedia isn't reliable. But on Japanese cars, it is. Therefore I don't really get why you keep you responding to my comments, even though I said you were right ages ago. If you want to end the conversation, stop responding. |
![]() ![]() 2017-02-22 19:54 | CarCrazedAlex586 wrote Well, Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so I gave you a reliable source just to make sure. I don't think you've ever been to the Japanese wikipedia then to look up info about a car. They have changes listed with exact dates, which are backed up by existing websites. So it's pretty accurate. |
![]() ![]() 2017-02-14 23:47 | carcrazedalex586 wrote Even Honda's Japanese site says this! www.honda.co.jp/auto-archive/civic/type-r/2005/ What's the point of this answer after a month, when I already said you were right? Needed the egoboost? |
![]() ![]() 2017-01-18 14:57 | carcrazedalex586 wrote www.allvehicles.co.uk/civic_black_anniv_009.jpg You are wrong. This picture shows a 2003 model. cdn1.evo.co.uk/sites/evo/files/styles/gallery_adv/public/car_photo_565258.jpg?itok=7nLC0QtV This license plate may be from 2003, but the license plate is from a Honda Jazz if you look it up on UK car check sites. I don't see how your evidence is relevant since this is the JDM model, not the UK model. Anyway, you are right, it's indeed a 2004. The regular Civic was facelifted in 2003, but the Type R only in january 2004 (according to the Japanese wikipedia). |
![]() ![]() 2017-01-18 07:17 | 2003 is correct. |
Add a comment
You must login to post comments...