Publicité
Images


Commentaires
Auteur | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() 2016-04-22 15:25 | I kinda miss him and old Top Gear ;( -- Last edit: 2016-04-22 15:27:06 |
![]() ![]() 2016-04-21 22:39 | ![]() I loved that segment from Top Gear, though I want to yell at Clarkson on how the Chrysler 340 isn't an engine that turns "torque into noise" ![]() However, he says something different in The Sunday Times... Jeremy Clarkson a écrit The engine was a Chrysler 6.2 V8, which turned money into noise but produced very little by way of power in the process. He instead says it's a Chrysler 6.2...which is 380 cubic inches...oh wait CHRYSLER DIDN'T MAKE A 380! I think he meant a 7.2, as Richard Hammond called it in the review of a 1968 Dodge Charger he was driving. Of course...this wasn't all Chrysler's fault. He continues... Jeremy Clarkson a écrit ...Which was probably a good thing, since the enormous live rear axle wasn’t really attached to the car in a way you’d call finished. And to make matters worse, Jensen would simply pop down to the local supplier whenever it needed a steering rack and come back with whatever was on the shelves. Some Jensens, by all accounts, were accidently sold to customers with steering designed for the Triumph Stag. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() 2016-04-21 22:23 | ![]() |
Ajouter un commentaire
Vous devez vous connecter pour poster un commentaire...